JOIN US IN STIRLING FOR A NIGHT OF CELEBRATION FIND OUT MORE
Date: 3rd September 2026

September 3 – The Dutch FA’s (KNVB) withdrawal of support for FIFA president Gianni Infantino and call for FIFA reform was rooted in a much deeper concern for the future of international football and FIFA’s role, than just the proposed FIFA Football Enterprise (FFE) commercial rights sale.
While they were clear that the ‘InfantinoGate’ crisis means, as far as they are concerned, his only route is out of the world governing body, they also said the bigger global football picture must be considered and proposed an ‘International Summit on the Future of FIFA’ that they would be prepared to host in Amsterdam – where FIFA was headquartered for more than 20 years of its existence.
“For the KNVB, the debate we are having today is about much more than the future of one President. It is about restoring trust in FIFA and determining what kind of institution FIFA should become. About defining a vision for the future, for the generations to come,” said the KNVB letter.
The long held criticism from outside Europe – and it is a narrative fuelled by FIFA president Gianni Infantino and his staff – is that Europe is working only for Europe and takes no-one else into consideration.
Certainly Europe has fought its corner hard but to pretend it is all Europe’s fault (after all, that is where Infantino came from in the first instance), is a naïve and surface-level sound-bite that plays to a one-eyed and simple view of football’s global, and more integrated than FIFA would like you to believe, eco-system.
The reality is that more than 800 of the 1,200+ players at FIFA’s World Cup play their club football in Europe, earn their livelihoods in the European leagues and UEFA’s competitions, and play for their chosen countries in FIFA’s competition (a large proportion of them as ‘heritage’ qualified players) without pay.
The harsh reality is that without Europe’s club players and club-created global stars, playing pretty much free of charge, FIFA doesn’t have a World Cup that can generate $15 billion in revenue and global media attention. That isn’t Europe’s fault.
The KNVB’s position is reflected throughout Europe’s federations in that this balance shouldn’t affect FIFA’s competitions or global opportunity and that more needs to be done to stimulate and support international federations both structurally and competitively.
In that regard the KNVB does have an appreciation of what is required, not least because in Curacao (who played at the 2026 World Cup) and Aruba there are two FIFA recognized nations that are Dutch territories, while Suriname is a former Dutch territory that maintains very close links – particularly in football – with the Netherlands.
“We believe UEFA has an important role to play in helping to facilitate this discussion, not by developing a European answer for world football, but by contributing to a genuinely global dialogue about the future of FIFA,” says the KNVB letter.
Before the 2023 FIFA presidential election that returned Infantino unopposed, the KNVB called for “stronger governance, greater transparency, democratic decision-making, separation of powers and effective checks and balances”. It also called for more responsibility to be shown around human rights and sustainability, as well as “a constructive and genuine reciprocal relationship” between FIFA and its member associations.
“That hasn’t happened,” says the KNVB.
It argues that the future of international football and FIFA’s role “should be built around three pillars”; good governance, the social power of football, and international co-operation. It outlines its ‘vision’ below:
FIFA needs a modern governance model that reflects the scale, complexity and global responsibility of the organisation. A system which fits a modern sports organisation, ready for the future…
Concrete initiatives
Football is more than a sport… FIFA should recognise, protect and invest in this unique social power. In many countries, national team football is one of the last domains where people bridge their differences, come together to celebrate and share in a common experience. Protecting this unique power should always take precedence over maximising commercial revenues.
Concrete initiatives
FIFA exists to develop football. It can only fulfil that mission through genuine cooperation with its confederations and Member Associations.
Concrete initiatives
Associations and global development programmes, while maintaining the reserves required to operate FIFA responsibly and sustainably.
The KNVB emphasizes that while Europe should have an active role in shaping FIFA’s future, “this cannot become a European project against the rest of the world. Our objective must be to bring the global football community together around a shared vision, based on dialogue, cooperation and respect for different perspectives and cultures.”
“Our loyalty, however, is ultimately to football and to the institutions that exist to serve it,” the KNVB says on the opening page of its letter. The question for football federations around the world is where does the FIFA president and his organisation’s real loyalty lie.
from Inside World Football
Posted in: Latest News